Wednesday 27 April 2016

The Soho Leopard by Ruth Padel



1.    What was your favourite/least favourite poem? Why?
2.    Why do you think the book was divided into sections? Do the sections make sense?
3.    How did you feel about the collection overall? Did you like/dislike it? Why?
4.    Many of the poems are based on myths or stories – did you like this? Did they work as poems?
5.    Did you notice any particularly striking uses of simile/metaphor?
6.    Could you relate to the subject matter of the poems?
7.    Animals feature very strongly in this collection - did you have any favourite animal poems? Did you like the theme? Was it too much?
8.    Did you notice any particular moods or feelings within the writing?
9.    The book is very “wordy” did you like this rich language?
10. What did you think of the title poem? Did you like/dislike it? Why do you think it was the title poem?
11. Did you find the notes at the end of the book helpful?

12. Did you have any other thoughts about individual poems or the collection as a whole?

Wednesday 30 March 2016

Skin Divers by Anne Michaels

1.    What was your favourite/least favourite poem? Why?
2.    Why do you think the book was divided into sections? Do the sections make sense?
3.    How did you feel about the collection overall? Did you like/dislike it? Why?
4.    Did you notice any particularly striking uses of simile/metaphor?
5.    Could you relate to the subject matter of the poems?
6.    Nature and natural themes feature quite strongly in this collection, how did you feel about the language and use of natural imagery? Did you like/dislike it? Was it too much?
7.    Did you notice any particular moods or feelings within the writing?
8.    Did you get much sense of the author or narrator from reading these poems?
9.    Did you notice any recurring themes and ideas within the collection? 
10. How did you feel about the title poem?
11.  In the poem Fontanelles there are quite a few references to different scientists and also to characters from classic literature, did you mind this? Did it exclude you from the text? Did it enhance your reading of it?
12. What did you think of the title poem? Did you like/dislike it? Why do you think it was the title poem?

Glossary:

Werner Karl Heisenberg – one of the pioneers of quantum mechanics. Awarded Nobel Prize in Physics in 1925. Considerable controversy surrounds his work on atomic research during World War II.

Jacques Lucien Monod – French biologist. One of the founders of molecular biology. Won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1965.

Jacques Loeb - German-born American physiologist and biologist.  Loeb was nominated many times for the Nobel Prize but never won. Loeb was able to cause the eggs of sea urchins to begin embryonic development without sperm.

Irène Joliot-Curie – daughter of Pierre and Marie Curie. Along with her husband, Joliot-Curie was awarded the Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 1935 for their discovery of artificial radioactivity.


Wednesday 24 February 2016

Kid by Simon Armitage





  1. What was your favourite/least favourite poem? Why?
  2.  How did you feel about the collection overall? Did you like/dislike it? Why?
  3. Did you notice any particularly striking uses of simile/metaphor?
  4. Could you relate to the subject matter of the poems?
  5. How did you feel about the language used in the collection? Is it accessible?
  6. There is quite a lot of humour in the collection – did you like/dislike this? Was it always successful?
  7. There is a sequence about Robinson dotted through the collection, did you get a feeling as to the character of Robinson? What type of person was he? Do you think he is a type? Is he a character with universal attributes? Or is he perhaps based in part on the author?
  8. There seems to be a sense of discontent within the collection – did you notice this? How did you feel about it? Did it seem to be related to one particular theme or was it more general?
  9. Did you get much sense of the author or narrator from reading these poems?
  10. Did you notice any recurring themes and ideas within the collection? 
  11. How did you feel about the title poem?
  12. What did you think was happening in the poem “Shrove Tuesday”?
  13. Not the Furniture Game is a list poem – what is the cumulative effect of the statements in the list? What feeling do the statements give you about the character? Does the list give you a sense of the physical shape of the man an/or his emotional state? What effect do the final two stanzas have and would the poem be as effective without them? What sense did you get of the relationship between the he and the she in the poem?
  14.  Who do you think the she is, who is referred to in “Lines though to have been Written…”?
  15. What do you think is the mysterious thing that has happened in the poem “8 p.m. and Raining…”?
  16. Eighteen Plays on Golfing as a Watchword pays homage to Wallace Stevens’ Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird, do you see any similarities between the poems (apart from the numbering and the title)? Is it a successful poem? Is it ironic?
  17. What did you think of the final poem in the collection “About His Person”? Did the list draw a picture of the character that owned them? What do you think happened to the character? Does the poem say anything about what we value or the meaning of life? Did it make you think about what might be found on your person?
  18. Do you think Armitage’s job, as a parole officer is evident as an influence in this collection?
  19. Would you seek out more of the author's work?

Tuesday 24 November 2015

Nil Nil by Don Paterson

  1. What was your favourite/least favourite poem? Why?
  2.  How did you feel about the collection overall? Did you like/dislike it? Why?
  3. Did you notice any particularly striking uses of simile/metaphor?
  4. Could you relate to the subject matter of the poems?
  5. How did you feel about the language used?
  6. Paterson uses some unusual words within the poems and as titles - would you have liked footnotes or a glossary? Did the lack of one affect your reading of the poems?
  7. Quite a few of the poems were written in the sonnet form - did you feel that these were successful?
  8. Did you get much sense of the author or narrator from reading these poems?
  9. Did you notice any recurring themes and ideas within the collection? 
  10. How did you feel about the title poem?
  11. How did you feel about the attitude to women in this collection?
  12.  Did the collection feel too long/too short/just right?
  13. Would you seek out more of the author's work?
Useful glossary:

Exeunt - used as a stage direction to specify that all (or certain named) characters leave the stage.
Heliographer - A device for transmitting messages by reflecting sunlight.
Perigee - the point in the orbit of the moon or a satellite at which it is nearest to the earth.
Orchitis - inflammation of one or both of the testicles.
Obeah - a term used in the West Indies to refer to folk magic, sorcery, and religious practices developed among West African slaves, specifically of Igbo origin.

Wednesday 30 September 2015

Citizen: An American Lyric - Claudia Rankine

1)   What were your overall impressions of the book? Did you like/dislike it? Why?
2)   What did you make of Rankine’s use of sections to divide up the book? Did they signal a change in subject matter? Did you think they were useful/necessary?
3)   The subject matter of the book is very emotive - how did the book make you feel as you were reading it? Did you have any physical/mental reactions? Was it a comfortable read?
4)   Do you think that Rankine dealt with the subject matter in a new or relevant way? Why?
5)   What did you think of the combination of prose and poetry? Was it effective? Did you like it? Did you want it to have more of one or the other?
6)   What did you think of the use of imagery within the book? How well does it work with text? What did you think of the layout? What message if any was it sending?
7)   Did you feel that book was relevant to you? Did it make you think about anything that had happened to you or anyone you know?
8)   Did you like the use of prose poetry? How do you think this fitted with the subject matter?
9)   Do you feel like the book has changed you or the way you think in any way?